Cases 31 - 40 of 71
PAOLICELLI v. WAL-MART STORES, INC
as 2:2014cv00267
Plaintiff:
JAMES PAOLICELLI
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BITTNER-MCALEAVEY v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00147
Plaintiff:
LISA BITTNER-MCALEAVEY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. , WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WAL-MART SUPERCENTER STORE #5381
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLEAVER v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2014cv00090
Plaintiff:
ALICE CLEAVER
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SWANK v. WAL-MART STORES, INC
as 2:2013cv01185
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SWANK
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
CLARK et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2013cv01179
Plaintiff:
NICOLE M. CLARK and CHRISTOPHER CLARK
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
THOMPSON et al v. WAL-MART STORES INC. et al
as 1:2013cv00164
Plaintiff:
RICK THOMPSON and DIANE THOMPSON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
HALE v. WAL-MART STORES, INC et al
as 2:2013cv00676
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HALE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC, WAL-MART STORES EAST,LP and WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JENKO v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
JAMES JENKO
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MCKOY v. WAL-MART STORES, INC et al
as 2:2012cv01668
Plaintiff:
WILLIE MCKOY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
