Cases 1 - 8 of 8
WHALEN v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT WHALEN
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PAYNE v. TRITT et al
as 1:2014cv00119
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT PAYNE, SR.
Respondent:
TRITT , DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY, PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CIAROLLA et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv01741
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT CIAROLLA , SHARON P. HEINNICKEL and DAWN LYNN O'CONNOR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
DEMOS v. U.S. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE et al
as 2:2013cv00139
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent:
U.S. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LASKO v. MCGRADY et al
as 2:2011cv00779
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT LASKO, JR.
Respondent:
JAMES MCGRADY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MERCER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBERTS et al v. PG PUBLISHING CO. et al
as 2:2010cv01673
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERTS , PATRICK O'CONNOR , ANTHONY SEBASTIAN and others
Defendant:
PG PUBLISHING CO., PITTSBURGH POST-GAZETTE/TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION NO. 7 EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN, BLOCK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
SOLIS v. ROBERTS et al
as 2:2010mc00185
Plaintiff:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, MARA SCANLON ROBERTS, STERLING PRINTING AND GRAPHICS, INC and others
DEMOS
as 1:2010cv00104
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
