Cases 1 - 10 of 18
SOOS v. ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2020cv00291
Defendant:
ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY and UNITED STEEL PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. SOOS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL, AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO v. CONTINENTAL CLAY COMPANY
as 2:2018cv00436
Plaintiff:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL, AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
CONTINENTAL CLAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL , AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC et al v. EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY
as 2:2018cv00367
Plaintiff:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL , AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC and UNITED STEEL WORKERS LOCAL 5852-11
Defendant:
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
BELCZYK et al v. BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00241
Plaintiff:
FRANK BELCZYK , SOPHIE BELCZYK , MICHAEL JURICH and others
Defendant:
BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES, INC., BWX TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
CUP et al v. AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv00189
Plaintiff:
RONALD A. CUP , MARK GREENAWALT and UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL, AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, AKERS NATIONAL ROLL COMPANY and AKERS NATIONAL ROLL COMPANY HEALTH & WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
CENVEO CORPORATION v. UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC
as 2:2016cv00982
Plaintiff:
CENVEO CORPORATION
Defendant:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL, AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO v. MEADVILLE FORGING COMPANY, L.P.
as 1:2016cv00019
Plaintiff:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL, AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
MEADVILLE FORGING COMPANY, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO CLC v. ALLEGHENY LUDLUM LLC
as 2:2015cv01133
Plaintiff:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO CLC
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY LUDLUM LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL, AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO v. UNION ELECTRIC STEEL CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv00911
Plaintiff:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL, AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
UNION ELECTRIC STEEL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO/CLC et al v. MOUNTAIN ENERGY, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01116
Plaintiff:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO/CLC and BRANDT HOAG
Defendant:
MOUNTAIN ENERGY, INC., MOUNTAIN ENERGY INC. RETIREMENT PLAN and DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
