Cases 1 - 10 of 5,991
Hemingway v. City of North Myrtle Beach et al
as 4:2024cv03553
Plaintiff:
La'Nisha Hemingway
Defendant:
City of North Myrtle Beach, Dana Crowell, Mike Pacileo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Alston v. Gallant Et AL
as 0:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
Londell Lashun Alston
Defendant:
Andrew W. Gallant Et AL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Baird v. Sharp et al
as 0:2024cv03549
Plaintiff:
Dewight Sheldon Baird
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Sharp, Sergeant T. Session and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Muhammad v. Carroll et al
as 1:2024cv01971
Plaintiff:
James Muhammad
Defendant:
Judge Tracy Carroll, Officer Hall, Officer Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Wazney v. Sumter County
as 3:2024cv03436
Plaintiff:
Robert W Wazney
Defendant:
Sumter County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Robinson v. Seay et al
as 6:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
David Seay, Brian Johnson, Anthony Basile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Gaillard v. Hill-Finklea Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv03496
Plaintiff:
Percy Devon Gaillard
Defendant:
Hill-Finklea Detention Center, Major Anthony Fyall, Cpt. Archie Beau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tabata v. City of Hanahan et al
as 2:2024cv03448
Plaintiff:
Luxolo Tabata
Defendant:
City of Hanahan, Mildred Rowell and Private First Class Goss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
McClellan v. Stirling
as 9:2024cv03458
Plaintiff:
James Anderson McClellan
Defendant:
Brian Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alston v. Beck et al
as 0:2024cv03433
Plaintiff:
Londell Lashun Alston
Defendant:
Judge Walton Henry Beck and County of York, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
