Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Nelson v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv00012
Petitioner:
Arthur A Nelson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kinslow v. Chapman
as 3:2015cv00429
Petitioner:
Battrick D Kinslow
Respondent:
Arvil Chapman and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Goodwin v. United States of America et al
as 4:2012cv00070
Petitioner:
Clarence Goodwin
Respondent:
United States of America and Sarah Revell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. USA
as 1:2011cv00057
Plaintiff:
David W Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Rosenboro v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv00102
Petitioner:
Herman Rosenboro
Respondent:
United States of America and Marty Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Waters v. United States of America
as 3:2010cv00046
Petitioner:
Hinton M Waters
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States et al v. O'Neal
as 3:2010cv00012
Defendant:
Ralph T. O'Neal, III
Plaintiff:
United States and Berong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States v. O'Neal
as 3:2010cv00013
Defendant:
Ralph T. O'Neal, III
Plaintiff:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
O'Neal v. Blount County Detention Center et al
as 3:2009cv00395
Petitioner:
Ralph T. O'Neal, III
Respondent:
Blount County Detention Center and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strickland v. United States of America
as 3:2008cv00319
Petitioner:
Edward William Strickland
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
