Cases 1 - 10 of 158
McCroskey v. The Robinette Company
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Gary McCroskey
Defendant:
The Robinette Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
v. The Robinette Company
as 2:2024cv00095
Defendant:
The Robinette Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McCroskey v. The Robinette Company
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Gary McCroskey
Defendant:
The Robinette Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bartol v. City of Chattanooga
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Robert Bartol
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Ferriss v. HomeServe USA Corp.
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Kristie Ferriss
Defendant:
HomeServe USA Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Tyler v. HomeServ USA Corp.
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tyler
Defendant:
HomeServ USA Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Bridge v. CommonSpirit Health
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Connie Tuggle Bridge
Defendant:
CommonSpirit Health doing business as CHI Memorial
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Flack v. Baylor School
as 1:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
Dan Flack
Defendant:
Baylor School
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Westbrook v. Chattanooga Hamilton County Hospital Authority
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Theresa Westbrook
Defendant:
Chattanooga Hamilton County Hospital Authority d/b/a Erlanger Health System and Erlanger Health, Chattanooga Hamilton County Hospital Authority doing business as Erlanger Health System and Erlanger Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Popp v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 3:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Gregory Popp
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
