Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lawson v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al (JRG1)
as 1:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
James Gregory Lawson
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Tennessee CVS Pharmacy, LLC and DiMucci Brainerd Property LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Vivian R. Grant v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00093
Plaintiff:
Vivian R. Grant
Defendant:
AIN2013 TN Soddy Daisy, LLC, CVS Store #5694, CVS 5694 TN, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Takoma Regional Hospital et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv00157
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Baptist Womens Health Center, LLC, Lexington Hospital Corporation, Amisub (SFH), Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rollins v. Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al
as 4:2019cv00048
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Torrent Private Limited, Express Scripts Holding Company and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde Rollins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodall, et al v. Walgreens Company, et al
as 1:2018cv00198
Defendant:
Walgreens Pharmacy, Walgreen Company and Dynaserv Florida, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sean Woodall, G. W. and Jena Woodall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner et al v. Howe et al
as 1:2014cv00129
Plaintiff:
Hannah Turner and L T
Defendant:
Charles Michael Howe, Grandview Medical Center , Ponder Pharmacy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson et al v. K-V Phamaceutical Company et al
as 3:2009cv00429
Plaintiff:
Curtis Simpson, Curtis Simpson, James Mayo and others
Defendant:
K-V Phamaceutical Company, Ethex Corporation, CVS Caremark Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hunter v. CVS Pharmacy et al
as 1:2009cv00246
Plaintiff:
Ramond Hunter, Sr.
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy and Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
