Cases 131 - 140 of 6,304
Collins v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00387
Petitioner:
Glenn Thomas Collins
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Defendant:
Warden Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Eads et al
as 1:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Robert Franklin Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeff Eads and Trinity Food Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Washington County TN Jail
as 2:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Washington County TN Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paris v. Mosley
as 3:2023cv00452
Petitioner:
Lamar Paris
Respondent:
Jamie Mosley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rush v. Lincoln County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Cody Allen Rush
Defendant:
Lincoln County Jail, Vicky Afisov, Chris Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Franklin v. Hamilton County Jail/Silverdale Dent. Center et al
as 1:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Dewayne Franklin
Defendant:
Hamilton County Jail/Silverdale Dent. Center, Kribble, M D Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Lawson et al
as 2:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Martin E. Hughes
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Butch Gallion, Autumn Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovell v. USA
as 3:2023cv00443
Petitioner:
Ronnie R Lovell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bell v. Eads et al
as 1:2023mc00034
Plaintiff:
Robert Franklin Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeff Eads and Trinity Food Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Hamblen County Sheriffs Dept Jail
as 2:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Larry R Lawson
Defendant:
Hamblen County Sheriffs Dept Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
