Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Taylor v. Cooper et al
as 3:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
James K Taylor
Respondent:
Bryan K Antonelli, Chief Cooper and Roger D. Wilson Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Cooper et al
as 3:2024mc00018
Petitioner:
James K Taylor
Respondent:
Bryan K Antonelli, Chief Cooper and Roger D. Wilson Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McFadden v. USA
as 3:2023cv00241
Petitioner:
Jeremy K. McFadden
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brant v. Tresslor et al
as 3:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Amber K Brant
Defendant:
Clifford Tresslor, Sgt. Odom, Sgt. Mulvane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. USA
as 3:2022cv00357
Petitioner:
James K Taylor
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clay v. Pingatore et al
as 1:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Gary Lebron Clay
Defendant:
K Pingatore, T Brewer, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritchie v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00284
Plaintiff:
Estate of Brandy Ellis b/n/k Paula Ritchie, mother of Brandy Ellis and Paula Ritchie
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Wellpath, LLC, Leslie Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tory v. USA
as 3:2021cv00281
Petitioner:
Jahmal K Tory
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hall v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2021cv00266
Petitioner:
DaRon K Hall
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Proffit et al
as 3:2021cv00142
Plaintiff:
Christopher K Davis
Defendant:
Chris Proffit, Jefferson County Jail, Jefferson County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
