Cases 31 - 40 of 267
Chadwick v. Roger D Wilson Detention Facility Staff
as 3:2021cv00285
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Chadwick
Defendant:
Roger D Wilson Detention Facility Staff, Chief Purvis, Chief Bravo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Tennessee Valley Authority et al
as 3:2021cv00232
Defendant:
Town of Louisville and Tennessee Valley Authority
Plaintiff:
Justin Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Smith et al v. SCI Tennessee Funeral Services, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00185
Plaintiff:
Robert Frank Smith and Mark Rogers
Defendant:
Service Corporation International and SCI Tennessee Funeral Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maples v. Rogers
as 3:2021cv00179
Respondent:
Sam Rogers
Petitioner:
Charles Travis Maples
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coldon v. TDOC et al
as 1:2021cv00096
Defendant:
Katherine Campbell, TDOC, Brett Cobble and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Coldon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2021cv00135
Defendant:
Emma Nurse, Hawkins County Jail Medical Department, Melissa Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Daniel Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2021cv00127
Defendant:
Cpl. Wialliam Mosley, Sgt. Smith, Nurse Carmen and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Daniel Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tumlin v. Rogers
as 1:2021cv00058
Petitioner:
Reginald D. Tumlin
Respondent:
Sammy Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Little et al v. City of Morristown, Tennessee et al
as 2:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Hamblen County, Tennessee, Esco R Jarnagin, City of Morristown, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Ruth Ann Little and David Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsons et al v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. (TV1)
as 3:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Roger Parsons and Pamela Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
