Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Fralix v. Phillips
as 1:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
Carey Fralix
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tucker v. Parris et al
as 1:2021cv00129
Petitioner:
Anthony Tucker
Respondent:
Herbert H Slatery, The Attorney General of the State of Tennessee and Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Church v. Director, TN DOC et al
as 1:2018cv00157
Petitioner:
William L Church
Respondent:
Director, TN DOC, Chairman, TN Parole Board, Gov. State of Tenn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Church v. Director, TN DOC et al
as 1:2018mc00013
Petitioner:
William L Church
Respondent:
Director, TN DOC, Chairman, TN Parole Board, Gov. State of Tenn and others
Richardson v. Paris et al
as 1:2018cv00089
Petitioner:
Derrick Richardson
Respondent:
Mike Paris and Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Paris et al
as 1:2018mc00010
Petitioner:
Derrick Richardson
Respondent:
Mike Paris and Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Joseph v. Attorney General of the State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2017cv00020
Petitioner:
Roger Joseph
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Tennessee and Randy Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. Lee et al
as 2:2015cv00278
Petitioner:
Douglas Wayne Young
Respondent:
Randy Lee and The Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. Lee et al
as 2:2015mc00013
Petitioner:
Douglas Wayne Young
Respondent:
Randy Lee and The Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Valle v. U.S. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (PLR1)
as 3:2015cv00388
Plaintiff:
Frances Mary Valle
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of and Attorney General of United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
