Cases 31 - 40 of 139
Doe #1 v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Doe (JEA)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Williams Bowers Management, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Williams Bowers Management, LLC doing business as Wide Open Music, Ash Bowers, Jimmie Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Doe v. Lee et al
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 v. Lee et al
as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prairie Pointe Orthodontics, P.A. v. Capital Accounts, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00468
Plaintiff:
Prairie Pointe Orthodontics, P.A.
Defendant:
Capital Accounts, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Silvernagel v. Pathgroup Holdings, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01013
Plaintiff:
Sean Silvernagel
Defendant:
Pathgroup Holdings, LLC, Associated Pathologists II, P.C., Ben Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe #14 v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv01075
Plaintiff:
John Doe #14
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmseth v. Page et al
as 3:2022cv00912
Plaintiff:
Timothy Charles Holmseth
Defendant:
Levi Henry Page, Alexandria Hannelore Goddard, John Doe 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe #13 v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
John Doe #13
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
