Cases 151 - 160 of 2,594
Sutton v. Penny Mac Loan Services, LLC
as 2:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Sutton
Defendant:
Penny Mac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00563
Defendant:
Damon T. Hininger, CoreCivic, Inc., John Doe 1 through John Doe 10 and others
Plaintiff:
John Smith and Soynia Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells, III v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
John C. Wells, III
Defendant:
William Lee, David Rausch and Frank Strada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stavropoulos v. Smithson et al
as 1:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Andrea Mae Stavropoulos
Defendant:
Lawrence Smithson, Robert Perkins, Brandon Dtanfill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee, David Rausch and Frank Strada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eady v. Humble Baron and Uncle Nearest Premium Whiskey et al
as 3:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dwight Eady
Defendant:
Humble Baron and Uncle Nearest Premium Whiskey doing business as Shelbyville Barrel House BBQ LLC and Society Insurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00956
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Page v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00851
Plaintiff:
Randel Edward Page, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Tennessee, The, EPIC Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00978
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
