Cases 11 - 20 of 2,602
Boyd v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Boyd
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Robert Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Doe #049 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Doe #049
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #052 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
John Doe #052
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. First Realty et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
First Realty, Howard Glen McDonald, Robert Grimsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newcomb et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Ralph Newcomb, Jessica Newcomb, Todd Mathis and others
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee and Williamson County School Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #058 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
John Doe #058
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Old School Sales, LLC et al v. Cooper et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Old School Sales, LLC doing business as Old School Vapor and Sak Wholesale, LLC
Defendant:
Brent Cooper, Don Brite, Andrew Burdett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferrell v. Overton County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Brandy Danielle Ferrell
Defendant:
Overton County, Tennessee, Clyde Collier and Matthew Farmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wellman v. Robin Hood Condos HOA
as 3:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
William Wellman
Defendant:
Robin Hood Condos HOA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Baker-Whitlow v. Meharry Medical College
as 3:2024cv00609
Plaintiff:
Chantel Baker-Whitlow
Defendant:
Meharry Medical College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
