Cases 1 - 10 of 2,607
Adams v. Rector et al
as 3:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Demetrice Adams
Defendant:
Gavin Rector, Tyler Comp, Ahscari Valencia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neisen v. Atwood
as 3:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Heather Neisen
Defendant:
Judge Bonita Jo Atwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (PDB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
John Doe (PDB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wattenbarger v. City of Crossville, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Wallace Shane Wattenbarger
Defendant:
City of Crossville, Tennessee, Officer Samantha Seay, Officer Ethan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SW Nashville EB Owner, LLC v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
SW Nashville EB Owner, LLC
Defendant:
The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee and Lucy Kempf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Putman et al
as 3:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Erwin D. Martin
Defendant:
Eric Putman, f/n/u Allen, Michael Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute
as 3:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (JDC) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
John Doe (JDC)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe (RLM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RLM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reguli v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Connie Reguli
Defendant:
Joseph A. Woodruff, Estate of Kimberly Helper, John Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
