Cases 111 - 120 of 1,570
Faulkner v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00655
Petitioner:
Benjamin Alexander Faulkner
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Perkins v. Perry
as 3:2022cv00550
Petitioner:
Jerome Perkins
Respondent:
f/n/u Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Loucks v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00617
Petitioner:
Paul Loucks
Respondent:
State of Tennessee and Dickson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thurman v. Attorney General for the State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00615
Petitioner:
James D. Thurman
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Tennessee and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. West Tennessee State Prison
as 3:2022cv00492
Petitioner:
William Carter King
Respondent:
West Tennessee State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Breedlove v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00618
Plaintiff:
Dionte L. Breedlove
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Keasling v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00529
Petitioner:
John Michael Keasling
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Silas v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00584
Petitioner:
Tammy Renee Silas
Respondent:
f/n/u Smith and Carswell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Harris v. Boyd
as 3:2022cv00443
Petitioner:
Ronald David Harris
Respondent:
Bert Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00440
Petitioner:
Joshua A. Woods
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
