Cases 71 - 80 of 1,562
Russell v. Phillips
as 3:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Henry Wayne Russell
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Sumner Criminal Court
as 3:2022cv01038
Petitioner:
Feliciano Perez
Defendant:
Sumner County Criminal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leonard v. Holloway
as 3:2023cv00004
Petitioner:
Jonathon Leonard
Respondent:
James Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Perry
as 3:2023cv00011
Petitioner:
Verchaunt J. Williams
Respondent:
Grady Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hopper v. Enbright Credit Union et al
as 3:2022cv01051
Petitioner:
Patrick Charles Hopper
Defendant:
Enbright Credit Union, Hendersonville Police Department, Sumner County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marsh v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Deandre Marsh
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Patton v. Rose
as 3:2022cv01016
Petitioner:
Eric Tyre Patton
Respondent:
Sharon Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Love v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00026
Petitioner:
Rodney L. Love
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hawkins v. Eller
as 3:2022cv01009
Petitioner:
Yasin Solomon Hawkins
Respondent:
Warden Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patel et al v. Washburn
as 3:2019cv00489
Petitioner:
Kalpesh Patel and Pratikkumar Patel
Respondent:
Rusty Washburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
