Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Harmer v. Cannata et al
as 3:2022cv00976
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Johnson Harmer
Defendant:
Katherine Johnson Cannata and Sidney Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
In re Nissan North America, Inc. Litigation
as 3:2019cv00843
Plaintiff:
Cathy Bashaw, Robert Garneau, Lisa Hendrickson and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
David Turner and VAUGHN KERKORIAN
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc. and Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mazza et al v. Atlas Roofing Corporation
as 3:2018cv00691
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson, John Curatolo, Michael Mazza and others
Defendant:
Atlas Roofing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. UMG Recordings, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01548
Plaintiff:
Syl Johnson
Defendant:
UMG Recordings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Curatolo et al v. Atlas Roofing Corporation
as 3:2013cv00865
Plaintiff:
John Curatolo , Teri Curatolo , Michael Mazza and others
Defendant:
Atlas Roofing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hester v. E-Loan Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00283
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Hester
Defendant:
E-Loan Inc., Paul Brown, Mike Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Other Fraud
Dees-Johnson v. Grundman et al
as 3:2011cv00811
Plaintiff:
Thelma Dees-Johnson
Defendant:
Jeanine Hines Watts Grundman and Darron Grundman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Passons et al v. Aviva Life and Annuity Company et al
as 3:2010cv00575
Plaintiff:
Gary A. Passons, M.D. , Gary A. Passons, M.D., P.C. , Anat V. Shah, M.D. and others
Defendant:
Aviva Life and Annuity Company , American General Life Insurance Company , David Cline, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carlyle v. Puckett et al
as 3:2008cv00776
Plaintiff:
Dan Carlyle
Defendant:
Bryan Puckett, Cynthia Puckett, Larry Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
