Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Cases 101 - 110 of 6,596
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Anemana v. Mayorkas
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff: Alexis Anemana
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Frase v. Holt Development Co., LLC
as 3:2024cv00304
Plaintiff: Nile Frase
Defendant: Holt Development Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe #046 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff: John Doe #046
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quinn, Jr v. Walmart et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff: Michael Quinn, Jr
Defendant: Walmart and Hilary Bond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #043 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff: John Doe #043
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe #045 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff: John Doe #045
Defendant: William Lee, David Rausch and Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #042 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff: John Doe #042
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marable v Ascension St. Thomas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00284
Plaintiff: Carl G. Marable
Defendant: Ascension St. Thomas of Rutherford, Murfreesboro Police Department, Rutherford County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?