Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Cases 141 - 150 of 6,631
Quinn, Jr v. Walmart et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff: Michael Quinn, Jr
Defendant: Walmart and Hilary Bond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #043 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff: John Doe #043
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe #045 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff: John Doe #045
Defendant: William Lee, David Rausch and Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #042 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff: John Doe #042
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marable v Ascension St. Thomas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00284
Plaintiff: Carl G. Marable
Defendant: Ascension St. Thomas of Rutherford, Murfreesboro Police Department, Rutherford County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00276
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00277
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jordan v. Metro Legal Department We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00268
Plaintiff: Marcia Jordan
Defendant: Metro Legal Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00275
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00261
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?