Cases 11 - 20 of 558
Doe #1 (JRC) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (JRC), John Doe #2 (TJC), John Doe #3 (RKF) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dowlen v. The City of Springfield, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Kierra Lachelle Dowlen
Defendant:
The City of Springfield, Tennessee and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #062 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
John Doe #062
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe #061 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
John Doe #061
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Doe (HWB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
John Doe (HWB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #60 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
John Doe #60
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burgess v. City of Pulaski/City of Pulaski Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Wayne Burgess
Defendant:
City of Pulaski/City of Pulaski Police Department, Officer Joel Robison, Officer John Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Nakomis Jones
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
