Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Larry L. Lemay v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2012cv00852
Plaintiff:
Larry L. Lemay
Defendant:
Katherine Ogilvie, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Escobar et al v. Gaines et al
as 3:2011cv00994
Plaintiff:
Angel Enrique Nunez Escobar, Jesus Antonio Sanchez Villalobos, Jorge Palencia Sarmiento and others
Defendant:
Lee Gaines, Christopher Koshar, Lee C. Worsham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Booker v. Ray et al
as 3:2011cv00268
Plaintiff:
Lashawn Booker
Defendant:
Gayle Ray, Jason Woodall, C. Scott Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sosa-Ortega v. Corkins et al
as 3:2010cv01162
Plaintiff:
Victor Sosa-Ortega
Defendant:
Samuel Corkins, John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hansen v. City of Cookeville, Tennessee et al
as 2:2010cv00097
Plaintiff:
Ivor Hansen
Defendant:
City of Cookeville, Tennessee, Chase Mathis, Darrin Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez-Calderon v. Jones et al
as 3:2010cv00814
Plaintiff:
Luis Gonzalez-Calderon
Defendant:
Truman Jones, Bob Asbury, Rutherford County Sherriff's Office-Rutherford County, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos-Macario v. Jones et al
as 3:2010cv00813
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ramos-Macario
Defendant:
Truman Jones, Bob Asbury, Rutherford County Sherif's Office ruthrford County, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Hale et al
as 3:2010cv00736
Plaintiff:
Joyce Brown
Defendant:
Michael Hale, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
