Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Zhai v. Bridgestone/Firestone Americas Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01213
Defendant:
Engine Lubricant Manufacturers, Marketers, Distributers, and Sellers with Business Entity Names A-Z, Retail Operations of Bridgestone/Firestone Americas Inc., Bridgestone/Firestone Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ann Zhai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abeyta v. Stonecrest Medical Center et al
as 3:2018cv00386
Plaintiff:
Jessica S. Abeyta
Defendant:
Stonecrest Medical Center, Harold Andrew Sloas, III, Bonnie Bingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parson v. United States Dept. of Agriculture/Centralized Services Center et al
as 3:2014cv01020
Plaintiff:
Sharon Parson
Defendant:
United States Dept. of Agriculture/Centralized Services Center, Barry Sykes, Doug Obrian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maliani v. Vanderbilt University Medical Center et al
as 3:2010cv00235
Plaintiff:
Haruna Kibundila Maliani
Defendant:
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt Medical Residents 1-999 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed et al v. State of Tennessee and its Legislature et al
as 3:2009cv00616
Plaintiff:
Carl Reed and Constance Haliburton-Bryant
Defendant:
State of Tennessee and its Legislature, Rutherford County, Rutherford County Circuit of the Sixteenth Judicial District of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Branch et al v. City of Franklin, Tennessee et al
as 3:2008cv00401
Plaintiff:
Julius Branch, Louise Branch and Michael Fleming
Defendant:
City of Franklin, Tennessee and Seven unknown named officers of the Franklin, Tennessee Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bowman v. Skyview Apartments et al
as 3:2007cv00417
Plaintiff:
Arthur L. Bowman
Defendant:
Skyview Apartments, Skyview Apartments, Maggie Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
