Cases 11 - 20 of 437
Williams v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Marty D. Williams
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Roderick D. Cobb
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesemann v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Clyde D. Wesemann
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Clifton D. Craig
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00217
Petitioner:
Darcel D. Wright
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dalton v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Dalton
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Fentress County, Shane Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Datrin Travis
Defendant:
Sarah-Ann Williams, Chief T. Conrad, A. Word and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Matson
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown-Perry et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Rekiesha Brown-Perry and Justin Brown
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanebutt v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Rick D. Hanebutt
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
