Cases 21 - 30 of 149
Hamby v. Parker et al
as 3:2019cv00646
Defendant:
Ken Hutchinson, Tony Parker, Dr. f/n/u Olroid and others
Plaintiff:
William Hamby, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madkins v. Slatery et al
as 3:2019cv00433
Petitioner:
Richard Earl Madkins
Respondent:
Tony Parker, Douglas Stephens, Damon Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perry v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2018cv01296
Defendant:
Morgan County Correctional Complex, Bill Haslam, Aramark Indestry Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 1:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
Corey D. Gilbert
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, f/n/u Tanner and Dentist f/n/u Brewster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bunch v. Sargent et al
as 3:2018cv00760
Defendant:
Corporal Clark Sargent, Kevin Cole, Jamie Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bunch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves v. Correctional Corporation of America, (CCA) et al
as 3:2018cv00029
Plaintiff:
Octaivian D. Reeves
Defendant:
Correctional Corporation of America, (CCA), Cynthia Pratt and f/n/u Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Parker et al
as 3:2017cv01444
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Dunn
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Cindy Jenkins, Neysa Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. CoreCivic et al
as 3:2017cv01316
Plaintiff:
LaDarius Q. Nelson
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Corrections Corporation of America, f/n/u Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00777
Plaintiff:
Eddie Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, f/n/u Christmas, James Hollaway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
March v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00253
Plaintiff:
Perry Avram March
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Aramark Correction Services, LLC, Tennessee Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
