Cases 51 - 60 of 171
Botello v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00549
Plaintiff:
Isreal Botello
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Tony Parker, CCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fentress v. Tennessee Department of Correction
as 3:2018cv00453
Plaintiff:
Donald Fentress
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction and Deberry Special Needs Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Tennessee Department of Correction ("TDOC")
as 3:2018cv00425
Plaintiff:
Michael Horton
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction (TDOC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schibik v. Hill et al
as 3:2018cv00413
Plaintiff:
Joseph Schibik
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Hill, (f/n/u) Tajuraun, Franko Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colbert v. Lindamoon et al
as 1:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
Casey Leon Colbert
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamoon, Michael Neilsen, Tyler Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Tennessee Department of Corrections, et al
as 3:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
Antaun Omari Davis
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Scott Schuch, Core Civic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vick v. Core Civic et al
as 1:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jasper Lee Vick
Defendant:
Core Civic, D. Hinniger, Tennessee Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00111
Petitioner:
William Walker
Respondent:
Tennessee Department of Corrections and Tennessee Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fraxlix v. Centurion Medical Group et al
as 3:2017cv01555
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Fraxlix
Defendant:
Centurion Medical Group and Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dilbeck v. Centurion Management Care et al
as 3:2017cv01515
Plaintiff:
Robert Dilbeck
Defendant:
Centurion Management Care, Tennessee Department of Correction, MaHarry Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.