Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Hills v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant:
Sheriff John Myers, Lt. Susan Taylor and Sgt. Dana Mobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hills v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland and Maury County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grayson Jr v. State of Tennessee, The
as 3:2023cv00549
Petitioner:
Ricky Lane Grayson Jr
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayson v. Martin
as 3:2023cv00351
Petitioner:
Ricky Lane Grayson
Respondent:
Frink Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Lawrence et al
as 3:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Antonius Carter
Defendant:
Mimi Lawrence, Chief Austin Boldie, Corporal Eric Yevin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Lane et al
as 3:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Fesnando F. Santos
Defendant:
Lieutenant f/n/u Lane and Sergeant f/n/u Coon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Lane, et al.
as 3:2021cv00281
Defendant:
Sgt. Briana Jackson, Amber Thomas, Sgt. f/n/u Voyles and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. King
Cause Of Action: 04 U.S.C. § 0051
Nour v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2021cv00189
Defendant:
Sgt. (f/n/u) Johnson, A. Gilbert, Davidson County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Abdulrahman Nour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wlodarz v. Centurion of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00292
Defendant:
Centurion of Tennessee, LLC and Edmund Lane
Plaintiff:
Stephen B. Wlodarz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
