Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Hills v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant:
Sheriff John Myers, Lt. Susan Taylor and Sgt. Dana Mobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Datrin Travis
Defendant:
Sarah-Ann Williams, Chief T. Conrad, A. Word and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Phillips et al
as 3:2023cv01285
Plaintiff:
Douglas Marshall Mathis
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hills v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland and Maury County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv01163
Petitioner:
Chavis Douglas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Dodson v. Bedford Co. Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00611
Plaintiff:
Douglas G. Dodson
Defendant:
Bedford Co. Jail and Ronnie Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton v. Pressley et al
as 3:2021cv00327
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Clinton
Defendant:
Mark Douglas Pressley, Southern Health Partners, Mark A. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2020cv00053
Petitioner:
Douglas Roberts Roach
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roach v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00029
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Maury County Sheriffs Department Jail, Kellwell Food Management and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Roberts Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
