Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Mackay v. Backyard Swing-N-Slide Play Systems, LLC
as 3:2014cv02032
Plaintiff:
Desiree Mackay
Defendant:
Backyard Swing-N-Slide Play Systems, LLC and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Caffey v. The Home Depot et al
as 3:2014cv00476
Plaintiff:
Rosalyn Litha Caffey
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Home Depot, The Home Depot, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2013cv00797
Plaintiff:
Ernest L. Hayes
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Mansfield v. The Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2013cv00228
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Mansfield
Defendant:
The Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Talley et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2012cv01206
Plaintiff:
Danny Talley and Sylvia Talley
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Chastain et al v. Tricam Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00798
Plaintiff:
Jarad Chastain and Jaclyn Chastain
Defendant:
Tricam Industries, Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Anstey v. Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2011cv00170
Plaintiff:
John Anstey
Defendant:
Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd., Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. , One World Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weatherly v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2010cv00992
Plaintiff:
Mary Weatherly
Defendant:
Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
