Cases 21 - 30 of 62
King v. Jennings et al
as 3:2016cv02482
Plaintiff:
Jimmy R. King
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Wilks, (f/n/u) Chalk and Jesse James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Warden of Toursdale et al
as 3:2016cv01951
Plaintiff:
Antoneo Williams and Myron Woods
Defendant:
Warden of Toursdale, Rhonda Staggs and Jesse James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendiola v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2015cv00995
Plaintiff:
Jesse Mendiola
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bey v. Tennessee, State of et al
as 3:2015cv00891
Plaintiff:
Akeem Bey
Defendant:
Tennessee, State of, Cheryl Blackburn, Gloria Dumas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Montagnino
as 3:2015cv00707
Plaintiff:
Louis Orlando Harmon
Defendant:
Jesse C.M. Montagnino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Martin Enterprises of the Carolinas, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Jackson Lane Adams and Terri June Adams
Defendant:
Martin Enterprises of the Carolinas, Inc. and Jesse Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Folds v. Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv02161
Plaintiff:
Mildred S. Folds
Defendant:
Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc. , Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. , Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Universal Technologies, Inc. et al v. Cleek et al
as 2:2014cv00091
Plaintiff:
Universal Technologies, Inc. and Jesse E. Rogers
Defendant:
Faye Cleek, Carla Bean, Nicholas Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Scruggs v. Schofield, et al
as 3:2014cv01900
Plaintiff:
Jesse Scruggs
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Tennessee Department of Correction and Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
