Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Roberts v. George et al
as 3:2012cv00474
Plaintiff:
Charles Roberts
Defendant:
James George and Carolina Cargo, Inc. of Rock Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dietz et al v. Carolina Cargo Inc. of Rock Hill
as 3:2012cv00344
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Dietz and Arthur Dietz
Defendant:
Carolina Cargo Inc. of Rock Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dennis v. RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00349
Plaintiff:
Nora Jean Dennis
Defendant:
RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc. , OWC, Ltd., Florida Rock & Tank Lines, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rock v. Harley-Davidson of Cool Springs
as 1:2010cv00058
Plaintiff:
Nicholette M. Rock
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson of Cool Springs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States of America et al v. Land in Maury County, Tennessee, an Easement and Right-of-Way Over 2.19 Acres, More or Less et al
as 1:2010cv00009
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Defendant:
Land in Maury County, Tennessee, an Easement and Right-of-Way Over 2.19 Acres, More or Less and Rock Creek Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act
Western Express, Inc. v. Rock Creek Lumber, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00162
Plaintiff:
Western Express, Inc.
Defendant:
Rock Creek Lumber, Inc., Anderson Hardwood Floor, Inc., C & E Hardwoods and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
