Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Lankford v. United States of America
as 3:2012mc00039
Petitioner:
John Pierce Lankford
Respondent:
United States of America
Pierce v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00121
Petitioner:
Nathan Lamont Pierce, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Daniels v. HCA Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01170
Plaintiff:
Julius Daniels
Defendant:
HCA Holdings, Inc. , Richard M. Bracken , R. Milton Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Schuh v. HCA Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01033
Plaintiff:
Karsten Schuh
Defendant:
HCA Holdings, Inc. , Richard M. Bracken , R. Milton Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Tuttobene v. The Assurance Group, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00978
Plaintiff:
Eric Tuttobene , Timothy Mark Byrd , Robert Souvannareth and others
Defendant:
The Assurance Group, Inc., Edward Lee Shackelford, Beverly Hackworth Shackelford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Other Fraud
Pierce v. Sears, Roebuck and Company
as 3:2010cv00659
Plaintiff:
Shelby J. Pierce
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ballinger et al v. Morgan Keegan & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00006
Plaintiff:
Douglas Ballinger, Douglas Ballinger, Mary Ballinger and others
Defendant:
Morgan Keegan & Co., Inc., Morgan Keegan & Co., Inc., Morgan Keegan & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Notice of Removal: Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jordan v. CCA et al
as 3:2008cv00765
Petitioner:
Derrick Jermaine Jordan
Respondent:
CCA, T. Pierce, D. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jordan v. CCA et al
as 3:2008mc00046
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jermaine Jordan
Defendant:
CCA, T. Pierce, D. Jones and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
