Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Thorpe v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Jeremy W. Thorpe
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC, Jeremy Smith, Valerie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darvin v. Correctional Development Center/Male et al
as 3:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Darvin
Defendant:
Correctional Development Center/Male, Aramark Food Services and Tennessee Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tankesly Jr v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant:
Ralph Adkinson, Kevin Genovese, Christa Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Clavin Tankesly Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chomsky et al v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00112
Plaintiff:
Don Chomsky and Amy Chomsky
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hodges v. Nichols et al
as 3:2019cv00624
Defendant:
Cpl. Nichols, Tony Parker and Aramark Corp.
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Hodges, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Hamby, Jr. v. Punchy et al.
as 3:2019cv00200
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Aramark Corp., Inmate Kitchen Workers and others
Plaintiff:
William D. Hamby, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2018cv01296
Defendant:
Morgan County Correctional Complex, Bill Haslam, Aramark Indestry Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
Paul Robinson
Defendant:
Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
