Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Elliott v. Conner et al
as 3:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Keisean Elliott
Defendant:
Deputy M. Conner, Deputy Sgt. (f/n/u) Gray and Williamson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayes v. Coyle et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jamaal M. Mayes
Defendant:
Andrew Coyle, Corey Stokes, Kenneth Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. Regions Bank
as 3:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Christopher Conner
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Pearl Records, Inc. et al v. Conner
as 3:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Pearl Records, Inc., Horse of Troy Productions, Inc. and Melcher Media Inc.
Defendant:
Craig Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Walker v. Youker et al
as 3:2021cv00010
Defendant:
A. Gifford, K. Spry, J. Floyd and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delta Dawgs Construction Corporation et al v. SERVPRO Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00785
Defendant:
Servpro Industries, Inc., Richard Conner and Ricky Conner
Plaintiff:
Delta Dawgs Construction Corporation, Paul Woloski and Tammy Woloski
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Taylor v. Sumner County Jail et al
as 3:2018cv00578
Plaintiff:
Caleb Taylor
Defendant:
Sumner County Jail, Bree (l/n/u), Sharan (l/n/u) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Parker et al
as 3:2017cv01270
Plaintiff:
Daniel Nelson
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Shawn Phillips, Gary Hamby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Seven90, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv02500
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Seven90, LLC, Joshua Askeroth, Eli Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Conner v. Schofield et al
as 3:2016cv01755
Plaintiff:
Robert Conner
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield and James Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
