Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Joyner v. Vilsack
as 1:2021cv01089
Defendant:
Thomas J Vilsack
Plaintiff:
Adam Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nguyen v. Boylan et al
as 2:2021cv02003
Defendant:
A. Juarez, D. Ingleharte, James Preble and others
Plaintiff:
Hai Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2020cv02644
Defendant:
(FNU) Weeams, Michael Rallings, (FNU) Hardaway and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schoenthal et al v. Carroll County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2019cv01161
Defendant:
Scotlund Hasley, Lori Collins, Carroll County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Schoenthal and Tara Neutzler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tinkle et al v. Dyer County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2018cv01124
Defendant:
Todd Fawver, Dyer County, Tennessee, Christopher Golden and others
Plaintiff:
Cary Tinkle, Rhonda Tinkle and ESTATE OF CADE TINKLE
Undetermined:
TJ Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Melvin Ingram, et al v. Robert Moore, et al
as 2:2017cv02795
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ingram , Shantel Adams , David Beck and others
Defendant:
Robert Moore , Charlene McGhee , Debra Hammons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hastings v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2017cv02687
Plaintiff:
Nedra Hastings
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Jimmy Moore, Van Sturdivant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weinberg v. County of Shelby et al
as 2:2017cv02474
Plaintiff:
Adam Weinberg
Defendant:
County of Shelby, Shelby County Sheriffs Office, Arthur Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Adams, et al.
as 2:2017cv02360
Plaintiff:
Julius Tyronza Andrews
Defendant:
Glenda Adams and Trina S. Dye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Stowe et al
as 1:2015cv01186
Plaintiff:
Paul Williams
Defendant:
Matthew F. Stowe, Adams Jowers, Mark Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
