Cases 131 - 140 of 2,184
Baker v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02007
Petitioner:
Daniel A. Baker
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henson v. Hall
as 1:2022cv01275
Petitioner:
Terry Wayne Henson
Respondent:
Hilton Hall, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blocker v. Genovese
as 1:2022cv01270
Petitioner:
Maurice Blocker and Ricky M. Blocker
Defendant:
Kevin Genovese and Sharon Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Fitz
as 2:2022cv02832
Petitioner:
Quincy D. Scott
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mobley v. FCI Memphis Warden et al
as 2:2022cv02734
Petitioner:
Kenneth Mobley
Respondent:
FCI Memphis Warden and United States of America Wardens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lee v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2022cv02747
Petitioner:
Wendolyn Lee
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Holloway
as 2:2022cv02858
Petitioner:
Gerraldo White and Geraldo White
Respondent:
James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hodge v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2022cv02794
Petitioner:
Andrew Hodge
Respondent:
State of Tennessee and Jonathan Skrmetti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Milligan v. Bowers
as 2:2022cv02702
Petitioner:
Rafeal Cordantez Milligan and Rafael Cordanie Milligan
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Spotts v. Bowers
as 2:2022cv02703
Petitioner:
Kelvin Andre Spotts
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
