Cases 71 - 80 of 2,184
Somerville v. Holloway
as 2:2023cv02445
Petitioner:
Jesse J. Somerville
Respondent:
James Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Drew v. Trate
as 2:2023cv02494
Petitioner:
Robert Drew
Respondent:
B. M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bobo v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02498
Petitioner:
Travis D. Bobo
Respondent:
Freddie Bowers, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McKinney v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02437
Petitioner:
Charles E. McKinney
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ibrihim v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2023cv02509
Petitioner:
Siraj Ibrihim and Robert Crain
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons and John Doe of United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Claxton v. Pounds
as 2:2023cv02553
Petitioner:
Darryl Claxton
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buckley v. Scott, et al
as 1:2023cv01145
Petitioner:
Dameion Buckley
Respondent:
Angela Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Green v. Eller
as 1:2023cv01170
Petitioner:
Donte Green
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eason v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02396
Petitioner:
Marcus Lamont Eason
Defendant:
Warden Bowers
Respondent:
Warden of FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02443
Petitioner:
Jermaine Hill
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers and United State Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
