Cases 21 - 25 of 25
Shelby County Board Of Education v. Memphis City Board of Education et al
as 2:2011cv02101
Defendant:
Memphis City Board of Education , Memphis City Council , DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
The Board of Education of Shelby County, Tennessee
Counter_claimant:
City Of Memphis, Tennessee; , Memphis City Council , Memphis City Board of Education and others
Counter_defendant:
The Board of Education of Shelby County, Tennessee , City Of Memphis, Tennessee; , Memphis City Council and others
Cross_claimant:
Memphis City Council
Cross_defendant:
STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Intervenor:
Snowden Carruthers , Michael Wissman , David Reaves and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Memphis Education Association , Keith Williams and Karl Thomas Emens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Wright v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv02065
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Obama, George W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2009cv01012
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Phil Bredesen, Polly Darnall and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Gilliam v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv02812
Plaintiff:
Lisa Kay Gilliam
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Memphis Center v. MRB Windyke, LP, et al
as 2:2001cv02069
Not Classified By Court:
James Allen and James H. Allen
Plaintiff:
Memphis Center for Independent Living
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
MRB Windyke, LP, Makowsky & Ringel, Inc., Belz Investco, LP and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
A.C. Electric Company, Inc, Ellendale Electric Company, Inc, Raleigh Plumbing Company, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
