Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Moses v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2016cv02253
Plaintiff:
Pamela Moses
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Allied Barton, Bryce Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. National Security Agency et al
as 2:2016cv02149
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
National Security Agency, FBI, Todd McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillip v. Dozier et al
as 2:2016cv02072
Plaintiff:
Charles Phillip
Defendant:
Steve Dozier , Kyle Anderson, Bill Haslam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moses v. Weirich et al
as 2:2015cv02806
Plaintiff:
Pamela Moses
Defendant:
Amy Weirich, Richard Desaussure, Bill Oldham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Thomas-Moore et al
as 2:2015cv02719
Petitioner:
Shirearl Taylor
Respondent:
Betty Thomas-Moore, Lonnie Thompson, Bill Oldham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Imam v. Aneshansel et al
as 2:2015cv02604
Plaintiff:
Missionary Imam
Defendant:
Rick Aneshansel, Sheldon Miller, J. Phillip Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers v. Coffee et al
as 2:2015cv02538
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Bowers
Defendant:
Lee V. Coffee, Deborah Owen, J. M. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2015cv02340
Plaintiff:
Larry T. Walker
Defendant:
City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, County of Shelby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Memphis, TN et al
as 2:2014cv02767
Plaintiff:
Raynell Williams
Defendant:
City of Memphis, TN and Bill Oldham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Shelby County,Tennessee d/b/a Shelby County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2014cv02742
Plaintiff:
Artie Smith
Defendant:
Shelby County,Tennessee d/b/a Shelby County Sheriff's Office , Bill Oldham and Nicholas Blumkin
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
