Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Holloran et al v. Duncan et al
as 1:2013cv01050
Plaintiff:
Daniel Coulborn Holloran and Daniel Coulborn Holloran, II
Defendant:
Joe Duncan , f/n/u Lowry , Lee Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McFarland v. Woolfork et al
as 1:2012cv01281
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eric McFarland
Defendant:
David L. Woolfork, Jimmy Harris, Rudder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yahweh v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2012cv02896
Plaintiff:
Yahoshua- Yisrael: Yahweh
Defendant:
City of Memphis, A.C. Wharton, Tony Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yahweh v. City of Memphis, et al
as 2:2012cv02897
Plaintiff:
Yahoshua- Yisrael: Yahweh
Defendant:
City of Memphis, A.C. Wharton, Tony Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Van Buren et al v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2012cv02776
Plaintiff:
Kennith Dewayne Lee Van Buren and Direct Action, Inc.
Defendant:
Tony Armstrong, A.C. Wharton and City of Memphis Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. City of Selmer, Tennessee et al
as 1:2012cv01101
Plaintiff:
James D. McKinney
Defendant:
City of Selmer, Tennessee , McNairy County, Tennessee , City of Selmer Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newton v. Lawson et al
as 2:2011cv03037
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Newton
Defendant:
G. Lawson , Larry Godwin, Tony Armstrong and others
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
