Cases 51 - 60 of 940
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ford v. Professional Credit Management, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02128
Plaintiff:
Devin Ford
Defendant:
Professional Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jayton Stinson, et al v. Wayne Haddix
as 2:2023cv02109
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Jayton Stinson and Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Wayne Haddix d/b/a 385 Ventures Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jayton Stinson, et al v. Wayne Haddix
as 2:2023mc00012
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Jayton Stinson and Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Wayne Haddix d/b/a 385 Ventures Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Milam v. West Tennessee Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01249
Plaintiff:
William J. Milam
Defendant:
West Tennessee Healthcare, Inc. doing business as Jackson Madison General Hospital, CITY OF JACKSON, TN, Edward McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
