Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Shaw v. Dewey et al
as 2:2024cv02197
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Robin Dewey, Makayla Powell, Toriance White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Windless v. Avergis et al
as 2:2022cv02754
Plaintiff:
Demetra Elaine Windless
Defendant:
Doctor John Avergis, Doctor Mary Keegan, Lisa Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain v. Haget et al
as 2:2022cv02225
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Tre Haget, Christopher Erlewine, John E. Hyten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02637
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Melvin Ingram, et al v. Robert Moore, et al
as 2:2017cv02795
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ingram , Shantel Adams , David Beck and others
Defendant:
Robert Moore , Charlene McGhee , Debra Hammons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goode v. The City of Southaven et al
as 2:2016cv02029
Plaintiff:
Kelli Denise Goode
Defendant:
The City of Southaven, City of Southaven Police Department, Todd Baggett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Oliver Branch Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv02652
Plaintiff:
Anthony Robinson
Defendant:
Oliver Branch Police Department, Craig Vinson, Garr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Evans et al
as 2:2015cv02097
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Oliver
Defendant:
Meekose Evans and City of Memphis, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
King v. Garner et al
as 2:2012cv02490
Plaintiff:
Hattie L. King
Defendant:
John Garner and Oliver Pugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Memphis City Schools et al
as 2:2012cv02474
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Nicole Banks
Defendant:
Memphis City Schools, Sunya Payne, Tiffany Eason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
