Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dionne v. Del Toro
as 2:2024cv02222
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dionne
Defendant:
Carlos Del Toro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Smith v. The City of Memphis et al
as 2:2023cv02773
Plaintiff:
Ashley McKenzie Smith
Defendant:
The City of Memphis, Cerelyn Davis, Nahum Dorme and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cathey v. CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT) et al
as 2:2023cv02707
Plaintiff:
Colton Cathey
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT), Cerelyn Davis, John Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Christopher Guy v. City of Memphis (Memphis Police Department) et al
as 2:2023cv02234
Plaintiff:
Christopher Guy
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
