Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gibson v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2021cv02441
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee and John Does 1-20
Plaintiff:
Bryan Gibson
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02870
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Johnson v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01051
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Anne Mariucci, Charles L. Overby and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Memphis Housing Authority et al
as 2:2016cv02652
Plaintiff:
Tanangela N. Anderson
Defendant:
Memphis Housing Authority, Dorian Jenkins and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Matthews v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2013cv02195
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lavell Matthews
Defendant:
City of Memphis, C. Holmes and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yahweh v. Steele et al
as 2:2012cv03074
Plaintiff:
I-Raguel Hananiah: Ibn Yahweh
Defendant:
Steele, Thompson, ShelbyCounty Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 2:2012cv03045
Plaintiff:
Bernard Coleman
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hightower v. Capital One Auto Finance et al
as 2:2012cv03042
Plaintiff:
Fannie Hightower
Defendant:
Capital One Auto Finance and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stout v. Carmax Auto Finance et al
as 2:2012cv02996
Plaintiff:
Charles Stout
Defendant:
Carmax Auto Finance and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nesbitt v. City of Milan, Tennessee et al
as 1:2008cv01313
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Nesbitt
Defendant:
City of Milan, Tennessee, Jason Krause, Clayton Westbrooks and others
Miscellaneou:
Janice Jones
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
