Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Lawrence v. Ryan et al
as 2:2023cv02102
Plaintiff:
Kevin P Lawrence
Defendant:
Kelly A Ryan, The Memphis Police Department and CITY OF MEMPHIS
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Brumley v. Soileau et al
as 2:2019cv02694
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC ("CCS"), Bill Kissell and Gary Soileau
Plaintiff:
Kelly Brumley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Motes v. Woodridge of West Tennessee, LLC
as 1:2019cv01210
Plaintiff:
Kelly Motes
Defendant:
REP Perimeter Holdings, LLC and Woodridge of West Tennessee, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cox et al v. City of Jackson, Tennessee et al
as 1:2019cv01026
Defendant:
Julien Wiser, City of Jackson, Tennessee and Daryl Hubbard
Plaintiff:
Kelly Freeman, Steven Cox, David Nagi and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Larry Pittman and Troy Springfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02821
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Arnold et al v. City of Crump, Tennessee et al
as 1:2018cv01227
Plaintiff:
Tracy Arnold and Bill Arnold
Defendant:
Randall Warren, Tim Kelly, City of Crump, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02781
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
