Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hogrobrooks Harris v. Lane et al
as 2:2018cv02571
Undetermined:
Jimmy Moore
Defendant:
Paul Elissiry, Marti Gerardi Probate Paralegal, Inc. and Byron R. Lane
Plaintiff:
Heather P. Hogrobrooks Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Person v. Roach et al
as 2:2014cv02788
Defendant:
Ashley Roach , Lauderdale County , The City Of Ripley and others
Plaintiff:
Earma Person
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pulley v. Henderson County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2013cv01276
Plaintiff:
Willie Lane Pulley
Defendant:
Henderson County, Tennessee, Heath Delaney and Collins Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Lane College
as 1:2013cv01161
Plaintiff:
Maurice L Bailey
Defendant:
Lane College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2007cv02189
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lanee Williams
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, E. Hoffman, R. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
