Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Spivey v. CITY OF MEMPHIS et al
as 2:2023cv02228
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk and Master W. Aaron Hall
Plaintiff:
Claude Maurice Spivey
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS and City of Memphis Civil Service Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moses v. Smith et al
as 2:2016cv02693
Plaintiff:
Pamela Moses
Defendant:
Julius Maurice Smith, Memphis Police Department, Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grace et al v. City of Ripley, Tennessee et al
as 2:2016cv02395
Plaintiff:
Dayle L. Grace and Thomas Alexander Grace
Defendant:
City of Ripley, Tennessee, Lauderdale County, Tennessee, City of Ripley Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovelace v. City of Ripley, Tennessee et al
as 2:2015cv02152
Plaintiff:
Cleve Wesley Lovelace
Defendant:
City of Ripley, Tennessee, Lauderdale County, Tennessee, City of Ripley Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyree v. U.S. Bank, NA et al
as 2:2014cv02476
Plaintiff:
Maurice Tyree
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, NA and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bailey v. Lane College
as 1:2013cv01161
Plaintiff:
Maurice L Bailey
Defendant:
Lane College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
