Cases 141 - 150 of 7,279
Norris v. Whiteville Correctional Facility
as 1:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Dexter Norris, Jr.
Defendant:
Whiteville Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joiner v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02778
Plaintiff:
Antonio Labaron Joiner
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Berry et al
as 1:2023cv01271
Plaintiff:
Cody Allen Rush
Defendant:
Rick Berry and Suzanne Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sayyed v. Harrison
as 2:2023cv02774
Petitioner:
Azia Ihab Sayyed
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shelton v. Windsor
as 1:2023cv01268
Plaintiff:
James Shelton
Defendant:
FNU Windsor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Tennessee Department of Probation & Paroles
as 2:2023cv02767
Petitioner:
Daniel Benson Taylor
Respondent:
Tennessee Department of Probation & Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. Shelby County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2023cv02770
Plaintiff:
Devonte D. Mason
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Office, Chief Burnett, Captain Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02769
Petitioner:
Stanley D. Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ayers v. Buford et al
as 2:2023cv02772
Plaintiff:
Keshawn Ayers
Defendant:
Sgt. Buford, Officer Avalos, Lt. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Obion County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01260
Plaintiff:
Bryan K Watkins
Defendant:
Obion County Jail and Jennifer Shirley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
