Cases 11 - 20 of 319
Webb v. Madison County Criminal Justice Complex
as 1:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Webb
Defendant:
Madison County Criminal Justice Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pipkin v. Coffee et al
as 2:2023cv02714
Petitioner:
Byron Pipkin
Respondent:
Lee V. Coffee and Floyd Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Hinninger et al
as 1:2023cv01217
Plaintiff:
Michael Robinson
Defendant:
David Hinninger, All Board of Trustees/All Members, Steve Conry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickman v. Bowles et al
as 1:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Rickey Allen Hickman
Respondent:
Lee Bowles, William Haywood, Jame Tucker, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown, Sr. v. Lee
as 1:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
James D. Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
Robert James Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pipkin v. Coffee et al
as 2:2023cv02483
Plaintiff:
Byron Pipkin
Defendant:
Lee V. Coffee, Leslie Byrd, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nagorny v. Dotson et al
as 1:2023cv01119
Plaintiff:
Henry Joshua Nagorny
Defendant:
Lee Dotson, Sharon Rose, Northwest Correctional Complex Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02330
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, S.C.S.O. Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby et al v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby, Robert L. Love, Jerrahmiah J. Rankins and others
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02300
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
