Cases 51 - 60 of 1,517
Brooks v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02471
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brooks v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02465
Petitioner:
Unique Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Freeman v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02451
Petitioner:
Antonio Freeman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bailey v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01139
Petitioner:
Casey Bailey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bowen v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02433
Petitioner:
Terry Bowen
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Levy v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02395
Petitioner:
Marcus Levy
Respondent:
United States of America and Acting Warden Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drain v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02354
Petitioner:
Billy Drain
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Douglas v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01106
Petitioner:
Dontoreus Douglas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Phillips v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01101
Petitioner:
Brian J. Phillips
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Beason v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02322
Petitioner:
Joshua Beason
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
